Friday, July 9, 2010

The Rise of London

Just read an interesting article on London and how, while it's always been an important city, as recently as the 1960s it was just one of many important cities: Manchester, Birmingham Liverpool, and Glasgow all had vibrant economies and communities.  However, they were all built on a manufacturing base which, like Detroit, dried up and moved elsewhere, leaving them struggling and London growing disproportionately to all other UK cities. 

Want some statistics to back that up? How about the 2001 census, which shows London has a higher population than the next 18 largest cities *combined*:

Rank City Population
1
London 7,172,091
2
Birmingham 970,892
3
Leeds 715,404
4
Glasgow 577,869
5
Sheffield 513,234
6
Bradford 467,665
7
Edinburgh 448,624
8
Liverpool 439,477
9
Manchester 392,819
10
Bristol 380,615
11
Cardiff 305,353
12
Coventry 300,848
13
Leicester 279,921
14
Belfast 276,459
15
Nottingham 266,988
16
Newcastle on Tyne 259,000
17
Kingston upon Hull 243,589
18
Plymouth 240,720

And according to this 2002 report, "Nineteen of the top 20 richest areas in England and Wales are in south-east England" -- in other words, London and the surrounding area.

As usual, I don't have any answers, but given my current search for a house, I noticed that in all the talks of distributing income and improving quality of life, no one has ever suggested limiting home ownership.  Think about it: When people buy to let, they are increasing demand for a limited supply of housing (ie prices go up), and then they turn around and rent it to people who can now no longer afford to buy.  Neither one has pride of ownership, and neither contributes to the community.  It also becomes self-perpetuating as investors look to buy in areas that are appreciating, making those areas more valuable, while making poor areas even less valuable.  Now, I'm not saying this is right (I am a libertarian, after all) or even enforceable (limited liability company, anyone?), but I just think it's interesting I've never even heard anyone question property investment as a sustainable and beneficial activity.

No comments: